Март 31st, 2023 
admin Gonzaga, Grams. C., Haselton, Meters. G., Smurda, J., Davies, M. S., & Poore, J. C. (2008). Progression and you will People Behavior, 29(2), 119�126.
Hazan, C., & Diamond, L. Meters. (2000). The spot out-of accessory from inside the peoples mating. Report about General Mindset, 4(2), 186�204.
Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, An excellent. (2002). Websites paradox reviewed. Record off Public Situations, 58(1), 49�74.
Kraut, Roentgen., Patterson, Yards., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Web sites paradox: A personal technology you to decreases social engagement and you can psychological really-becoming? American Psychologist, 53(9), 1017�1031.
The key benefits of self-confident illusions: Idealization and the structure away from fulfillment in the personal dating
Kreider, Roentgen.Yards., & Industries, J. Meters. (2001). Amount, time, and you can duration of marriages and you can divorces. Current Inhabitants Reports, 70-80, (Arizona, DC: U.S. Census Bureau, 2005).
Lemieux, Roentgen., & Hale, J. L. (2002). Cross-sectional study regarding closeness, hobbies, and partnership: Review the latest presumptions of triangular idea of love. Psychological Reports, 90(step 3,Pt1), 1009-1014. doi:/PR0.90.step 3.1009-1014
Lockwood, P., Dolderman, D., Sadler, P., & Gerchak, Age. (2004). Feeling best regarding performing even worse: Societal reviews inside personal matchmaking. Journal out-of Character and you can Public Therapy, 87(1), 80�95.
Maner, J. K., Miller, S. L., Rouby, D. An excellent., & Gailliot tinder vs bumble, Meters. T. (2009). Record from Identification and Public Psychology, 97(1), 74�87.
Intrasexual vigilance: Brand new implicit cognition out of personal competition
Maner, J. K., Rouby, D. An excellent., & Gonzaga, Grams. C. (2008). Automatic inattention so you’re able to glamorous choice: The latest progressed mindset off matchmaking repair. Advancement and you will People Behavior, 29(5), 343�349.
pold, B. Age. (1981). Sequential data of argument and you may accord within the disturb and nondistressed marital partners. Log of Consulting and you may Medical Psychology, 49(4), 554�567.
McKenna, K. Y. A great., Environmentally friendly, An excellent. S., Gleason, Yards. J. (2002). Dating development online: What is the larger destination? Diary out-of Social Facts, 58(1), 9�29.
Neff, L. A beneficial., & Karney, B. R. (2002). Self-review motives for the intimate matchmaking: A model of around the world enhancement and certain verification. In the P. Noller & J. A great. Feeney (Eds.), Information ents on the study of couple correspondence (pp. 32�58). Nyc, NY: Cambridge College or university Drive.
Obegi, J. H. (2008). The introduction of the client-therapist thread from contact regarding connection idea. Psychotherapy: Idea, Research, Routine, Training, 45(4), 431-446. doi:/a0014330
Pickett, C. L., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). The newest social keeping track of program: Improved sensitivity so you’re able to social cues as a transformative response to public exemption. Inside K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), The fresh social outcast: Ostracism, personal exception to this rule, getting rejected, and you will bullying (pp. 213�226). New york, NY: Psychology Press.
Penetrate, T., & Lydon, J. Age. (2001). All over the world and you will specific relational activities on connection with personal affairs. Record regarding Identity and you will Public Mindset, 80(4), 613�631.
Rholes, W. S., Simpson, J. An effective., Tran, S., ). Accessory and you may information seeking to when you look at the romantic relationship. Identity and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(3), 422�438.
Ross, L. R., & Spinner, B. (2001). Standard and you can specific connection representations inside the adulthood: Is there a love?. Journal Off Social And private Dating, 18(6), 747-766. doi:407501186001
Rusbult, C. Age., Olsen, Letter., Davis, J. L., & Hannon, P. A. (2001)mitment and you will relationships repairs components. When you look at the J. Harvey & A good. Wenzel (Eds.), Personal close relationship: Restoration and you will improvement (pp. 87�113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Schul, Y., & Vinokur, A beneficial. D. (2000). Projection myself feeling one of partners due to the fact a function of brand new similarity within common skills. Identity And you will Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(8), 987-1001. doi:1672002610008
Seligman, C., Fazio, Roentgen. H., & Zanna, Meters. P. (1980). Outcomes of salience off extrinsic perks to your liking and you may loving. Diary out of Identity and you will Public Therapy, 38(3), 453�460.
Опубликовано в рубрике 
cuatro. Conclusion: End using your real matter for Tinder membership
Edarling VS Amoureux ? Lequel site en compagnie de bagarre accorder ?