Март 29th, 2023 
admin Gonzaga, Grams. C., Haselton, M. G., Smurda, J., Davies, M. S., & Poore, J. C. (2008). Development and you will People Choices, 29(2), 119–126.
Cross-sectional data away from closeness, interests, and union: Review the new assumptions of your own triangular principle from like
Hazan, C., & Diamond, L. Meters. (2000). The area away from accessory in human mating. Overview of Standard Mindset, 4(2), 186–204.
Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, An effective. (2002). Internet sites contradiction revisited. Log out-of Personal Situations, 58(1), 49–74.
Kraut, R., Patterson, Yards., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet paradox: A social technology you to definitely decrease public wedding and emotional better-being? Western Psychologist, 53(9), 1017–1031.
Kreider, Roentgen.M., & Industries, J. M. (2001). Amount, time, and you will duration of marriages and you may divorces. Current Inhabitants Reports, 70-80, (Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau, 2005).
Lockwood, P., Dolderman, D., Sadler, P., & Gerchak, E. (2004). Feeling best regarding the performing even worse: Social comparisons within close relationships. Diary away from Character and you can Personal Mindset, 87(1), 80–95.
Maner, J. K., Miller, S. L., Rouby, D. An excellent., & Gailliot, Meters. T. (2009). Record regarding Identification and Personal Psychology, 97(1), 74–87.
Maner, J. K., Rouby, D. A great., & Gonzaga, G. C. (2008). Automatic inattention to help you glamorous choice: The changed mindset off matchmaking maintenance. Advancement and Peoples Choices, 29(5), 
343–349.
pold, B. Age. (1981). Sequential research of dispute and accord into the disappointed and you can nondistressed marital couples. Record of Contacting and Systematic Psychology, 49(4), 554–567.
McKenna, K. Y. An excellent., Green, A. S., Gleason, M. J. (2002). Relationships development on the internet: What’s the big destination? Diary from Public Circumstances, 58(1), 9–29.
Murray, S. L., Holmes, J. G., & Griffin, D. W. (1996). Some great benefits of confident illusions: Idealization as well as the construction off fulfillment when you look at the personal matchmaking. Diary out-of Character and Personal Psychology, 70(1), 79–98.
Neff, L. An effective., & Karney, B. R. (2002). Self-research motives when you look at the close matchmaking: A model of globally enhancement and you will particular confirmation. During the P. Noller & J. An excellent. Feeney (Eds.), Expertise ents from the study of partners communication (pp. 32–58). Ny, NY: Cambridge School Force.
Intrasexual vigilance: The latest implicit cognition out of intimate competition
Obegi, J. H. (2008). The development of the client-counselor bond through the lens of accessory concept. Psychotherapy: Concept, Look, Routine, Degree, 45(4), 431-446. doi:/a0014330
Pickett, C. L., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). Brand new public monitoring system: Increased sensitiveness so you can public signs as an adaptive response to personal different. Within the K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), The new public outcast: Ostracism, social difference, rejection, and you can intimidation (pp. 213–226). Nyc, NY: Psychology Force.
Penetrate, T., & Lydon, J. Age. (2001). In the world and you will specific relational activities on the contact with societal interactions. Record out of Identity and you may Public Therapy, 80(4), 613–631.
Rholes, W. S., Simpson, J. A great., Tran, S., ). Connection and information seeking for the close relationship. Character and you may Social Therapy Bulletin, 33(3), 422–438.
Ross, L. R., & Spinner, B. (2001). Standard and you can certain attachment representations from inside the adulthood: Can there be a relationship?. Journal Out of Personal And private Dating, 18(6), 747-766. doi:407501186001
Rusbult, C. E., Olsen, N., Davis, J. L., & Hannon, P. A beneficial. (2001)mitment and you can matchmaking maintenance components. Inside the J. Harvey & A. Wenzel (Eds.), Romantic close dating: Maintenance and enhancement (pp. 87–113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Schul, Y., & Vinokur, An excellent. D. (2000). Projection actually impact among partners since the a purpose of new resemblance inside their shared knowledge. Identification And Public Psychology Bulletin, 26(8), 987-1001. doi:1672002610008
Seligman, C., Fazio, Roentgen. H., & Zanna, Meters. P. (1980). Outcomes of salience of extrinsic perks into the liking and enjoying. Log away from Character and Public Therapy, 38(3), 453–460.
Опубликовано в рубрике 
cuatro. Conclusion: End using your real matter for Tinder membership
Edarling VS Amoureux ? Lequel site en compagnie de bagarre accorder ?